Filings and Cases

This week, brought a major new development in Louisiana v. EPA.   The Western District of Louisiana formally vacated the EPA and DOJ regulations the Biden Administration maintained imposed disparate-impact liability, "in so far as they authorize disparate-impact liability."

The ACR Project led a coalition in drafting and filing a Supreme Court amicus brief supporting the Association for Education Fairness's cert. petition in their challenge to the proxy discrimination of Montgomery County, Maryland's public school system.

Following the logic of our amicus brief, the 8th COA avoids a constitutional morass by vacating Biden-Era-FCC's "digital discrimination" rule imposing disparate impact liability across lines of race and "income level."

On behalf of CFER and its taxpaying members, the ACR Project has filed an action in Sacramento Superior Court. It seeks a declaration that California’s Black Infant Health program violates Title VI and the U.S. and California Constitutions.

San Francisco has settled its part of CFER and the ACR Project's challenge to its discriminatory guarantied income programs.

As 2025 comes to a close, we’re happy to report that policymakers across all three branches of the federal government are confronting the fundamental Constitutional problems with how Congress structured the Minority Serving Institutions programs.

EDTN approves the ACR Project's intervention into the Constitutional challenge to the discriminatory provisions of the HSI programs.

The ACR Project filed briefing at SCOTUS, supporting West Virginia's defense of its schools' separate boys' and girls' sports programs.

With Manhattan Institute, the ACR Project filed an amicus brief at the Supreme Court. It asks the Justices to take a case and use it to free litigants from the standing trap (a pure catch-22) the Fourth Circuit has created to prevent challenges to racially discriminatory governmental presumptions.