Following the logic of our amicus brief, the 8th COA avoids a constitutional morass by vacating Biden-Era-FCC's "digital discrimination" rule imposing disparate impact liability across lines of race and "income level."
On behalf of CFER and its taxpaying members, the ACR Project has filed an action in Sacramento Superior Court. It seeks a declaration that California’s Black Infant Health program violates Title VI and the U.S. and California Constitutions.
San Francisco has settled its part of CFER and the ACR Project's challenge to its discriminatory guarantied income programs.
As 2025 comes to a close, we’re happy to report that policymakers across all three branches of the federal government are confronting the fundamental Constitutional problems with how Congress structured the Minority Serving Institutions programs.
EDTN approves the ACR Project's intervention into the Constitutional challenge to the discriminatory provisions of the HSI programs.
The ACR Project filed briefing at SCOTUS, supporting West Virginia's defense of its schools' separate boys' and girls' sports programs.
In October 2024, we filed with the en banc Eleventh [...]
With Manhattan Institute, the ACR Project filed an amicus brief at the Supreme Court. It asks the Justices to take a case and use it to free litigants from the standing trap (a pure catch-22) the Fourth Circuit has created to prevent challenges to racially discriminatory governmental presumptions.
For NAS and FASORP, the ACR Project filed to join Tennessee's challenge to the Hispanic Serving Institutions programs' discriminatory criteria.
Sacramento County has settled our challenge to its so-called “guaranteed income” program that unlawfully chose beneficiaries based on race.
The American Civil Rights Project, a public-interest law firm, seeks to assure that American law equally protects all Americans. The American Civil Rights Project is a tax-exempt, Texas non-profit under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.