Journal of Law & Civil Governance at Texas A&M Publishes “Title VII’s Classification Bar: Section 2(a)(2), Disparate Impact, and EEO-1s”
JLCG has selected for inclusion in Issue 1 of its [...]
JLCG has selected for inclusion in Issue 1 of its [...]
The ACR Project filed a comment with the Office of [...]
Following the logic of our amicus brief, the 8th COA avoids a constitutional morass by vacating Biden-Era-FCC's "digital discrimination" rule imposing disparate impact liability across lines of race and "income level."
On behalf of CFER and its taxpaying members, the ACR Project has filed an action in Sacramento Superior Court. It seeks a declaration that California’s Black Infant Health program violates Title VI and the U.S. and California Constitutions.
The ACR Project filed an administrative complaint challenging a host of discriminatory programs at Cal State Northridge.
The ACR Project and Manhattan Institute jointly comment in support of HUD's proposed improvements to its Fair Housing Act regulations.
San Francisco has settled its part of CFER and the ACR Project's challenge to its discriminatory guarantied income programs.
As 2025 comes to a close, we’re happy to report that policymakers across all three branches of the federal government are confronting the fundamental Constitutional problems with how Congress structured the Minority Serving Institutions programs.
The ACR Project and Manhattan Institute jointly comment in support of CFPB's proposed improvements to its Equal Credit Opportunity Act regulations.
The ACR Project filed an administrative complaint with the U.S. Departments of Justice and Education, challenging the illegality of the University of California-Hispanic Serving Institutions Doctoral Diversity Initiative. The program prefers to send UC's funding to even private schools enrolling the proscribed racial balance than to let those dollars fund only work at UC campuses that don't.