Racially Discriminatory Corporate Policies: Who’s Liable?

Laws banning discrimination have been on the books across America for more than a century and a half. Their prohibitions are among the most morally grounded, widely known, and widely supported in our law. Despite these facts, the last decade saw a cavalcade of corporations adopt policies that seemingly commit to violating these laws. While academics have spilled much ink considering whether such policies violate these laws, remarkably little attention has focused on whom they make liable for corporate violations. That omission masks a surprisingly under-appreciated near-consensus that American law makes individual decisionmakersliable for programmatic discrimination by the enterprises through which those decisionmakers discriminate. Officers and directors of major enterprises should bear this consensus in mind when considering the adoption, implementation, or retention of discriminatory policies.

2024-09-06T19:15:41-05:00September 6th, 2024|Blog|

California: One Big Step Forward, Four Small Steps Back

California's legislature seemingly just can't help itself. Even after quiet-killing yet another effort to amend the state's constitution to reauthorize racial discrimination, last week, Assembly committees sent to the floor bills to racially classify Californians and start awarding benefits to Californians based on those classifications.

2024-09-04T17:18:59-05:00August 21st, 2024|Blog, Submissions|

Minnesota Telecom Alliance v. FCC: ACR Project Amicus on the Unconstitutionality of a Disparate-Impact Regime Policing Across Ability to Pay

In the consolidated litigation challenging the FCC's "digital discrimination" rule, the ACR Project filed an amicus brief with the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals supporting the petitioners' challenges. The relevant law (as the FCC interprets it) falls far short of Constitutional compliance.

2024-04-30T17:35:56-05:00April 30th, 2024|Blog, Filings and Cases|

ACR Project and CEO Jointly File Brief on Behalf of Cory R. Liu, Supporting Challenge to SEC Approval of Discriminatory NASDAQ Listing Requirement

We and CEO filed an amicus brief on behalf of Corey R. Liu with the 5th COA, supporting a challenge to the SEC's 2021 approval of NASDAQ's alteration of its listing requirements. Those requirements irrationally prioritize a very particular, very odd concept of "diversity."

2024-04-17T08:40:21-05:00March 29th, 2024|Blog, Filings and Cases|
Go to Top