American Civil Rights Project
The American Civil Rights Project knows that Americans’ civil rights are individual rights, equally held by all (regardless of whether those rights are understood as a positive enactment of centuries of ratifiers or as the common endowment of all children from nature and nature’s God). The ACR Project exists to protect and, where necessary, restore the primacy of all Americans’ shared civil rights. And we need your help!
Donate to Support Our Mission
The American Civil Rights Project, a public-interest law firm, seeks to assure that American law equally protects all Americans. The ACR Project needs your help to pay for its efforts seeking to accomplish that goal. The ACR Project is a tax-exempt public charity, under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, so all contributions to the ACR Project may be tax deductible under Section 170 of the Code.
Our Latest News
The ACR Project, FASORP, WILL, and CEO File Wide-Sweeping Title VII Charge Against the ABA
The ACR Project, FASORP, WILL, and CEO file wide-sweeping Title VII Charge Against the ABA. The ACR Project and WILL anticipate that the EEOC will take corrective action. Should it not do so, the ACR Project anticipates taking further action on behalf of FASORP to bring the ABA into compliance with American nondiscrimination law.
ACR Project Alerts Ohio AG Yost That State Schools Continue to Operate Illegal, Race-Based Scholarships
The ACR Project, through its Ohio co-counsel, Ben Flowers of Ashbrook Byrne Kresge Flowers, today alerted Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost that, despite A.G. Yost’s prior directives, a pair of Ohio’s public universities systematically violate the U.S. Constitution and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act through their administration of racially exclusive scholarships.
ACR Project Files Amicus Brief supporting Tennessee in U.S. v. Skrmetti
In U.S. v. Skrmetti, the Biden Administration would have the Court declare that the Equal Protection Clause prevents states from protecting children from potentially harmful medical interventions, when those interventions are related to children’s purported “gender identities.” In the brief we filed today, we explain that this is wrong, regardless of what the Court decides a potentially ephemeral “gender identity” at odds with one’s biological sex legally is and–as a result of the answer to that question–the level of scrutiny it applies to this statutory challenge based on it.