dan_admin_civil

In U.S. v. Skrmetti, the Biden Administration would have the Court declare that the Equal Protection Clause prevents states from protecting children from potentially harmful medical interventions, when those interventions are related to children’s purported “gender identities.” In the brief we filed today, we explain that this is wrong, regardless of what the Court decides a potentially ephemeral “gender identity” at odds with one’s biological sex legally is and–as a result of the answer to that question–the level of scrutiny it applies to this statutory challenge based on it.

The ACR Project asked the en banc 11th Circuit to reverse a rogue opinion faulting an employer providing health insurance that does not cover any psychologically-driven surgical treatments for body dysmorphia for also failing to have that same insurance cover "sex change" surgeries.

More-than-half the states have gone 8/8 in their challenges to the Administration's regulations re-writing Title IX. The Administration has appealed the resulting injunctions.  As those appeals move forward across the various circuits, the ACR Project continues to answer the bell, now submitting amicus briefs supporting the states in the litigation at the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits.

When the Biden Administration released its rule re-writing Title IX, [...]

The ACR Project filed a pair of briefs supporting the [...]

The ACR Project filed a new amicus brief at the [...]